It
is amazing how we will be able to conjure many definitions to what we can
actually mean by a writer but when we try to fit ourselves into any of them,
they magically seem inadequate. Let’s see, if we say a person who writes is a
writer, then it would seem really inadequate and may even elicit jeers and boos
for all the definition’s worth. But if we say a writer is someone who writes
something that someone else deems appropriate to read, now that is a scary
thought which humble souls like yours truly would have trouble in accepting
till we will be read. And I’m not one of those people who can write without
caring whether their works will be read. No sir, I need an audience.
Now
every writer worth his laptop and time would tell you that there should be an
inner voice urging you to put down your thoughts, and implore you when you stop
and all that jazz but well we all know it is a very broad definition of a
writer. The idea to define a writer came to me when I was in one of my
retrospective moods over some Old Monk Rum. Now that is one fine rum if there
ever is one. It is more of a need to define myself, which I chose to equate to
the bigger thing that looms in all my thoughts. Now it is important for all of
us to know what we are writers or no writers but at the point at which I find
myself now, the question seems far more relevant than what I took it to
mean.
One
of my earliest delusions have led me to believe that I would be able to
scribble coherent text and make a point that I wanted to make or my thoughts
would be miraculously deciphered by reading between my intellectually vague
lines. But if there is one trait that I don’t have that writers should
usually have is the art of being articulate with my thoughts and most often
when I read my own stuff, it seems far from what I wanted to convey. My
lamentations on lack of discipline to research and organize my thought
processes were entirely futile and now I’m afraid I’m running out of time.
Most
of the time my reviews or opinions lack the point of view or a stand for the
fear of not being well researched to take one. The fact that I attributed that
to my skewed definition of being objective was coming across as quite lame as I
uncovered more facts about anything I have written till date. At those times I
want to discard all my work and disown my blogs. I have done it but that never
gave me any solace. Nor did starting it all over again. Though I do have a bit
of hope in my fiction and screenwriting I cant chose one over the other and
that leaves me rather stupid or ambitious much to my own chagrin. The miserable
fact is that I don’t fit into any category of writers due to the lack of a
vision.
But
I write mostly to satisfy my megalomaniacal instinct that surprisingly never
gets satiated. I tell myself that I’m not important in the scheme of things and
try to be modest but I can’t kid myself long with that line of argument. When I
write, it is not to say that I have an opinion or I have something to add. It
is not even that I can write but it comes from an inherent insecurity and
inferiority complex that I never lived at all. Through all my innumerable
failed decisions, guilt trips and lost opportunities when I step into a distant
future and be lucky enough to find someone who calls me a writer, I would turn
back to ask him what kind of a writer did/does he think I am.
Writing is the best media for the writer to express himself like painting is for the painter. All the forms of expressions including writing will come out like a seed breaking out from the surface of the earth when it is ready and cannot hold down anymore. Then external factors shape the artist and his/her creations.
ReplyDeleteI agree to what you have said, but my post is more about what the term writer means and it is an exploration of what kind of a writer I am, if I'm even one.
Delete